CaseClarityCaseClarity

Learn

Practice notes on
AI in Canadian law.

Written the way we build: specific, source-minded, and honest about limits. No keyword filler, no vendor fog. More notes as the work earns them.


Note one

An alternative to DivorceMate: what to ask before you change how your firm runs support calculations

The honest evaluation questions, whichever way you go: who does the typing, where each number comes from, what gets stamped, and what a calculator alone is actually worth.

Note two

Client consent for AI-assisted legal work: a working checklist for BC firms

The questions a firm should be able to answer before AI touches a client file: processing, residency, retention, training use, disclosure, and supervision. With the Zhang v. Chen lesson stated exactly.

Note three

What “Canadian data residency” does and does not mean

Storage, processing, backups, and sub-processors are four different facts. Five follow-up questions that make a vendor’s real answer appear, and our own answers held to the same standard.

There is no contact form. We are a team you email: hello@caseclarity.ai