No portal. No platform. Nothing new to learn.

A private AI legal team, working your actual matters.

It reads and organizes the file, runs the research, drafts the work, checks every citation, watches every deadline, runs your support calculations, and fills your court forms. It lives in the inbox you already use.

You approve everything. You sign everything.

Email hello@caseclarity.ai How it works

From: You
To: Your team
Subject: Hartwell

Draft a letter to opposing on Hartwell asking for the outstanding bank statements by the 30th.

From: Your CaseClarity team
To: You
Subject: Re: Hartwell (FN90312)

Got it. I am drafting a letter to opposing counsel on Hartwell (FN90312) asking for the bank statements still outstanding from your disclosure request of 12 May, with a deadline of the 30th. The draft comes to you as a Word document for review.

With thanks,
your CaseClarity team

Illustrative. Names, dates, documents, and figures on this page are invented, including the support calculation and the court form; the shape is what arrives on your real matter.

It does the work.

It works your 500-document divorce, not a blank text box.

From: You
Subject: Re: Hartwell (FN90312)

Send me the complete chronology of the matter, every entry sourced.

From: Your CaseClarity team
Subject: Chronology: Hartwell (FN90312)

Here is the matter in date order, every entry carrying the exact quote it came from and the page it lives on.

3 of 41 entries
Date	What happened	Where it says so
14 Mar 2023	Parties separate; the respondent moves out of the family home.	Affidavit of R. Hartwell, para 6, p. 2: I moved out of the family home on 14 March 2023.
2 Jun 2023	Joint account closed; balance transferred to the respondent’s sole account.	Bank statement, June 2023, p. 3, line 41.
19 Jan 2024	Claimant’s counsel requests updated financial disclosure.	Letter to opposing counsel, 19 Jan 2024, p. 1.

Anything the file cannot support is left off, or flagged.

With thanks,
your CaseClarity team

The AI never does the math.

Regular software computes every number.

From: You
Subject: Re: Hartwell (FN90312)

Child support for each year on the Hartwell file.

From: Your CaseClarity team
Subject: Child support: Hartwell (FN90312)

A plain-English summary, a sheet laid out for court, and a workings page a judge can check line by line, all from one sealed record so they can never disagree.

Child support: Hartwell (FN90312)

Illustrative, invented data

Federal Child Support Tables, British Columbia, in force from 1 October 2025

Payor: R. Hartwell, respondent
Province: British Columbia
Children: 2
Payor’s income, 2025: $86,4002025 income tax return, line 15000, DOC‑0012, p. 2
Table amount: $1,343 per monthTable for 2 children, income $86,000 to $86,999: $1,337 plus 1.52% of the $400 above $86,000

Every figure names its source inside its report.

With thanks,
your CaseClarity team

Research whether an independent adult child’s wills-variation claim can succeed where the will explains the unequal division. Facts as in Novak.

You, in your own words

You stay the lawyer.

Every case we cite is checked against CanLII, and every quote against the full published judgment. When a check can’t be done, the email tells you. Checked by software, then by you.

Before anything goes out, ask how the other side will likely read it, and you get a predicted reading, clearly labelled as predicted.

Nobody can instruct it pretending to be you: it acts only on email that genuinely comes from your own firm address. Anything for the outside world is a draft you review and send yourself, and you sign everything.

Built around Law Society of BC guidance, with a written client-consent workflow developed with your firm at onboarding.

From: Your CaseClarity team
Subject: Re: Novak

Your memo is attached: a structured memo on authority checked against CanLII, the options and their trade-offs, and what the evidence cannot answer said plainly.

Then ask for the first draft. You edit in Word; the team reads your edits.

Novak research memo.docx

With thanks,
your CaseClarity team

Your original email, quoted: Research whether an independent adult child’s wills-variation claim can succeed where the will explains the unequal division. Facts as in Novak.

Costs like software, works like staff.

One monthly fee for your firm’s own system, and a published price for each kind of work: a letter, a research memo, an agreement, a court form, an intake. You know what a piece of work costs before you ask for it.

Work is drawn from a prepaid balance your firm controls (think of it like a retainer you top up), and every month you get an itemized invoice by lawyer, file and request. Questions to the team are always included. No seats, no seat minimums, month-to-month.

From: You
Subject: Re: Hartwell (FN90312)

Prepare the financial statement form from the disclosure on file.

From: Your CaseClarity team
Subject: Financial statement: Hartwell (FN90312)

The court’s own form, filled from the file, every entry traceable to its source. You review, sign, and file it.

Form F8 (Rule 5-1 and 7-1 (8), (10) and (11))

Illustrative, invented data

Court File No.:: E-90312
Court Registry:: Vancouver Registry

In the Supreme Court of British Columbia

Financial statement

Part 1: Income

I am employed by [name and address of employer]

Novak Freight Ltd., Delta, BC2025 T4, DOC‑0014, p. 1

1 Employment income

$7,200 Paid: monthlyPay statement, October 2026, DOC‑0015, p. 1

4 Interest and investment income

Left blank for you: the bank statements are still outstanding from your disclosure request of 12 May.

Anything the file couldn’t fill is listed in the email, and the team never files a guess.

With thanks,
your CaseClarity team

One folder. That’s the whole setup.

Give your AI legal team read-only access to the matter folder you already keep. No migration, no data entry, no new system, nothing to learn.

It reads the file as it actually is: pleadings, disclosure, correspondence, scans, photos of documents, spreadsheets. Anything it cannot read with confidence, it flags for you. It never guesses.

And nothing else changes. Whatever software runs your practice today keeps running it. There is no username and no password: your side of the system is email itself.

You didn’t install anything. You shared a folder.

Raise the ceiling on your intake.

This is not about replacing staff. It is about how much work your firm can say yes to.

Every practice has a ceiling: the matters you can responsibly carry with the people you have, set mostly by how long intake, research, and first drafts take. CaseClarity moves that work from days to hours. More matters through the same firm, with the same people, at the quality you sign your name to.

Who this is for right now, and who it is not.

If you are outside today’s fit, email anyway and we will be straight with you about timing.

A good fit today

A BC family-law or wills practice with document-heavy matters, matter files kept in folders, and a lawyer who wants a say in how it improves and what we add next.

Founding firms get first say in what we build next.

Not yet

Other provinces and practice areas: that is where this goes, not where it starts.
Anyone wanting unsupervised legal advice, automatic filing, or client-facing AI, which this will never be.
Consumer self-help, which this is not.

Every other tool is software you operate. CaseClarity is a team you email.

We are working with founding firms in BC family law and wills, one firm at a time. Wider availability follows.

From: You
To: hello@caseclarity.ai

There is no contact form. We are a team you email.

Email hello@caseclarity.ai