No portal. No platform. Nothing new to learn.
A private AI legal team,
working your actual matters.
It lives in the inbox you already use. There is nothing to install, nothing to migrate, and nothing to learn. Whatever software runs your practice today keeps running it.
You share a folder, read-only, from the files you already keep. Then the work starts arriving: intake, research, first drafts, the numbers, the forms, all on your real matter, all verified before it reaches you. You email a question and get a researched answer. You email an instruction, and the team writes back exactly what it will act on, one tap to approve. You sign off on everything.
Say it in your own words
There is no syntax to learn.
You write the way you would brief a junior. Questions just get answered. Instructions come back as the exact words first, and nothing starts until you tap Confirm. Not quite right? Reply. Fresh words, fresh button.
Catch up
“Catch me up on Osei. What’s outstanding, and what’s waiting on me?”
Where the matter stands, what is moving, and the items that need your call.
“What disclosure is still outstanding from the other side?”
Item by item: what was requested, what arrived and when, and what is still missing.
The record
“Send me the complete chronology of the matter, every entry sourced.”
The whole matter in date order, every entry carrying the exact quote it came from and the page it lives on. The chronology you otherwise build by hand for affidavits.
“Where does the evidence conflict on the separation date?”
Both versions, quoted and sourced, so you argue from the conflict instead of hunting for it.
Research and drafting
“Research whether an independent adult child’s wills-variation claim can succeed where the will explains the unequal division. Facts as in Novak.”
A structured memo grounded in verified CanLII authority, the options and their trade-offs, and what the evidence cannot answer said honestly. The choice among them stays yours.
“First draft of the separation agreement, per the retainer and the disclosure on file.”
A complete first draft from your actual documents. You edit in Word, and the team picks up your edits for the next version.
“Prepare the financial statement form from the disclosure on file.”
The court’s own form, filled from the file, every entry traceable to its source. You review, sign, and file it.
The numbers, and before it goes out
“Run the support numbers three ways on Hartwell: shared parenting, primary residence with our client, and the schedule opposing proposed.”
Three stamped calculation sheets, side by side, every input traced to its source. Spousal ranges presented as what they are: advisory. The AI never does the math. Regular software computes every number.
“Before this letter goes out, tell me how opposing counsel will read paragraph 4.”
A predicted reading, confidence-tagged, with anything the other side could exploit. Predicted is the operative word. It informs your judgment, never replaces it.
And underneath, always
You will rarely see any of this. It is what makes the rest safe to use.
The most important checks are not AI at all: citations are verified by deterministic code against the real record, and calculations are computed by regular software. And none of it answers in seconds, on purpose. A chat window replies instantly because it checks nothing; here, the reading, drafting, verifying, and reviewing take minutes to hours, and the checking is the product.
The file organizes itself
The matter folder you already keep becomes the record: the people, the dates, the chronology, every fact carrying the exact quote it came from and the page it lives on. Anything it cannot read with confidence is flagged for you. It never guesses.
The deadline watchdog
Every limitation date on the file is tracked, and the reminders escalate as each date approaches, whether or not you ask. Deadlines never silently lapse.
Citations, checked twice. Then by you.
Every citation is independently verified against CanLII before it reaches you, once when the work is drafted and again at an independent review. No invented cases. The third check is your spot-check at sign-off, because the name on the work is yours.
The wall
It cannot send anything outside the firm. It cannot file. It cannot sign. That is how the system is built, not a policy it follows. You are the only way anything leaves.
A system of your own
Most legal software keeps every firm’s files behind logins on one shared platform. Yours is built for your firm and used by no one else: your firm’s system and files are hosted in Canada, never pooled with other firms, never used to train anything.
Where the matter stands
Every email from the team carries a button that opens a read-only page showing where the matter stands. No login. Fail-closed by design: only what the file actually supports; anything contradicted or unverified is left off entirely.
The calculator, included
Support calculations in the same subscription, computed by regular, deterministic software, stamped with the table versions used, every input traced to its source. The AI never does the math.
The receipts
Compute is billed at cost and itemized to the file as a disbursement, like court fees. At the pilot firm, a research memo with sixteen verified citations came to $9.25. Per-file spend caps, and your own instructions always run. No surprise bills.
How we compare
Every other tool is software you operate.
Research portals give you answers with sources; you still do everything else. Practice-management AI assists inside its own platform. The enterprise platforms are priced for large firms. The support calculator is priced per user and typed by hand; ours is included, fed from the file itself. So are the court forms. All of them are software you log into, learn, and run. CaseClarity is a team you email: whole matters, from your own files, verified before it reaches you, under your sign-off. We are glad to be compared on exactly that.
The honest question
Couldn’t you build this yourself?
You could build the easy part: an assistant that searches CanLII and drafts. The hard part is everything that has to be true before you would let it near a real client file.
Left to its own word, an AI assistant invents cases, and a home-built one has no independent check to catch it. Ours verifies every citation against the real record, twice, before anything reaches you. It cannot send anything outside your firm, cannot file, cannot sign. It keeps a tamper-evident record that shows the work was supervised, and it runs on a system built for your firm alone, with a written client-consent workflow included.
And it has to keep working: CanLII changes, the models change, your file storage changes. With CaseClarity that upkeep is invisible to you. You have a practice to run. We built the parts you would not want to be responsible for getting wrong.
There’s no demo file and no sandbox. Your real matter is the demo. Share the folder, and the work starts arriving the same day.
There is no contact form. We are a team you email: hello@caseclarity.ai